Functional Modules

    Introduction to the regulation of focal adhesion assembly[Edit]

    The rate and extent of focal adhesion formation and maturation are regulated by factors such as synergistic integrin-syndecan signaling and alternating activation cycles of Rac1, Cdc42 and RhoA GTPases.

    Neither syndecan nor integrin is capable of independently supporting cell adhesion or spreading. Despite the cooperativity of integrin-syndecan pairs in various contexts (reviewed in [1]), recent studies have established synergistic signaling by integrin β1 and syndecan-4; they play cooperative yet distinct roles in cell spreading and maturation of adhesions as well as directional migration respectively [2, 3]. The receptors co-localize in early adhesion sites at the leading edge with ligand binding by both receptors (e.g fibronectin binds via cell binding domain [RGD] to integrin and via HepII domain to syndecan) being necessary for downstream signaling [4, 5]. This is crucial as the cell polarity and migration is determined by differentially regulating signals at the leading and trailing edges.

    Figure 1. Rho GTPases regulate adhesion dynamics and cytoskeletal reorganization during motility: Rho family GTPases Cdc42, Rac1 and Rho act at different regions in a cell (indicated by arrows) to orchestrate migration. Cdc42 generally controls the cell polarity and the formation of filopodia and nascent focal adhesions (shown as yellow dots). Rho influences cell adhesion assembly and maturation, in addition to controlling stress fiber formation and contractile activity. Rac1 primarily controls actin assembly and nascent adhesion formation in the lamellipodium.
    Migration comprises of cycles of membrane protrusion, attachment, and cytoskeletal contraction, which causes forward movement. Immobilization of the integrin ligand is absolutely necessary to generate tension for adhesion formation and actin bundling while syndecan signaling primarily helps sense the environment for membrane protrusion. Localized signaling happens through alternating activation cycles of GTPases Rac1 (lamellipodium) and/or Cdc42 (filopodium) and RhoA, regulated by protein kinase pathways at the leading edge [6] (reviewed in [7, 8]).

    Figure 2. Cyclic activation of Rac and Rho regulate adhesion dynamics during migration: The schematic highlights the signaling pathways that play a significant role in mediating GTPase-regulated protrusion in the lamellipodia and the differential adhesion dynamics various regions of the cell. FAK signaling is important at all stages of the adhesion life cycle while kinases such as PAK and ROCK influence later stages by promoting actomyosin contractility. PAK is highlighted in green during maturation to indicate that is it activated earlier by Rac and not by Rho. Adapted from [9, 10].
    Stable adhesion induced by Rac1 may initially support tension, which allows RhoA-mediated contractility and pulling forces to impart stability on the bonds, thereby generating subsequent signals that are disseminated to the rest of the cell or axon [11, 12, 13, 14, 15]; these signals serve as feedback loops to restrict the direction of protrusion and reduce local activity of Rac1 [16, 17]. It is to be noted that either receptor contributes to the regulation of both GTPases, however, Rac1 is primarily influenced by syndecan-4 [18]. Coordination of such complex signaling is rendered by guidance signals.

    References

    1. Morgan MR., Humphries MJ., Bass MD. Synergistic control of cell adhesion by integrins and syndecans. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007; 8(12). [PMID: 17971838]
    2. Thodeti CK., Albrechtsen R., Grauslund M., Asmar M., Larsson C., Takada Y., Mercurio AM., Couchman JR., Wewer UM. ADAM12/syndecan-4 signaling promotes beta 1 integrin-dependent cell spreading through protein kinase Calpha and RhoA. J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278(11). [PMID: 12509413]
    3. Bass MD., Morgan MR., Humphries MJ. Integrins and syndecan-4 make distinct, but critical, contributions to adhesion contact formation. Soft Matter 2007; 3(3). [PMID: 19458789]
    4. Woods A., Longley RL., Tumova S., Couchman JR. Syndecan-4 binding to the high affinity heparin-binding domain of fibronectin drives focal adhesion formation in fibroblasts. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2000; 374(1). [PMID: 10640397]
    5. Clark RA., An JQ., Greiling D., Khan A., Schwarzbauer JE. Fibroblast migration on fibronectin requires three distinct functional domains. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2003; 121(4). [PMID: 14632184]
    6. Guo F., Debidda M., Yang L., Williams DA., Zheng Y. Genetic deletion of Rac1 GTPase reveals its critical role in actin stress fiber formation and focal adhesion complex assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 2006; 281(27). [PMID: 16698790]
    7. Burridge K., Wennerberg K. Rho and Rac take center stage. Cell 2004; 116(2). [PMID: 14744429]
    8. Guilluy C., Garcia-Mata R., Burridge K. Rho protein crosstalk: another social network? Trends Cell Biol. 2011; 21(12). [PMID: 21924908]
    9. Renaud B., Buda M., Lewis BD., Pujol JF. Effects of 5,6-dihydroxytryptamine on tyrosine-hydroxylase activity in central catecholaminergic neurons of the rat. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1975; 24(18). [PMID: 17]
    10. Ris MM., Deitrich RA., Von Wartburg JP. Inhibition of aldehyde reductase isoenzymes in human and rat brain. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1975; 24(20). [PMID: 18]
    11. Lamoureux P., Buxbaum RE., Heidemann SR. Direct evidence that growth cones pull. Nature 1989; 340(6229). [PMID: 2739738]
    12. Smith AS., Sengupta K., Goennenwein S., Seifert U., Sackmann E. Force-induced growth of adhesion domains is controlled by receptor mobility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008; 105(19). [PMID: 18463289]
    13. Balaban NQ., Schwarz US., Riveline D., Goichberg P., Tzur G., Sabanay I., Mahalu D., Safran S., Bershadsky A., Addadi L., Geiger B. Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001; 3(5). [PMID: 11331874]
    14. Gomez TM., Robles E., Poo M., Spitzer NC. Filopodial calcium transients promote substrate-dependent growth cone turning. Science 2001; 291(5510). [PMID: 11239161]
    15. Katsumi A., Milanini J., Kiosses WB., del Pozo MA., Kaunas R., Chien S., Hahn KM., Schwartz MA. Effects of cell tension on the small GTPase Rac. J. Cell Biol. 2002; 158(1). [PMID: 12105187]
    16. Woo S., Gomez TM. Rac1 and RhoA promote neurite outgrowth through formation and stabilization of growth cone point contacts. J. Neurosci. 2006; 26(5). [PMID: 16452665]
    17. Rottner K., Hall A., Small JV. Interplay between Rac and Rho in the control of substrate contact dynamics. Curr. Biol. 1999; 9(12). [PMID: 10375527]
    18. Bass MD., Roach KA., Morgan MR., Mostafavi-Pour Z., Schoen T., Muramatsu T., Mayer U., Ballestrem C., Spatz JP., Humphries MJ. Syndecan-4-dependent Rac1 regulation determines directional migration in response to the extracellular matrix. J. Cell Biol. 2007; 177(3). [PMID: 17485492]
    Updated on: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:44:11 GMT