Functional Modules
Test Your Knowledge | 1.5 Formation of AdhesionsAs the lamellipodia continues to spread and expand forward, adhesion sites form along the leading edge (see video below). These sites not only provide traction for the cells forward movement, but permit the cell to sense and measure the rigidity of its substrate. Formation of these adhesions is a complex process, involving a number of steps and functional modules.To read more about adhesion formation please follow the link to Focal Adhesion Initiation. Particularly important in lamellipodia function is the spatial arrangement of adhesions at the leading edge. Lamellipodia extension and retraction is not uniform across the whole cell and similarly, adhesion sites will not be uniformly distributed. Instead a number of factors may influence arrangement including chemistry of the extracellular matrix, substrate stiffness and cells growth conditions, as described under ‘matrix properties’. Interestingly, distribution of adhesion sites was found to be coupled to actin polymerization, with conformationally activated, but unliganded β1 integrins, shown to be interacting with elongating filaments [1]. Importantly, this interaction permits a sideways distribution along the leading edge, ensuring clusters of β1 integrin are positioned at the very front of cell protrusions. β1 integrin was also found, in the same study, to localize at the tips of growth cone filopodia [1]. Latest Findings Paxillin, a scaffold protein, has recently been shown to integrate physical cues sensed by adhesion complexes in order to confer directionality for lamellipodial protrusions [2]. Focal Adhesions as Molecular Clutches:Once formed, focal adhesions essentially act as “molecular clutches”, promoting protrusion at the leading edge whilst suppressing membrane contraction (reviewed in [3, 4, 5]). Adhesions aid forward movement by regulating the forces produced by actin dynamics in different cellular compartments through several methods:1) They aid membrane protrusion by resisting actin retrograde flow [6] and hence, indirectly promote the force produced by lamellipodial actin polymerization. 2) They convert myosin pulling forces at the lamellar interface into traction forces against the ECM that pulls the cell body forward [7, 8]. These two methods are interdependent and cooperatively contribute to the propulsive forces generated at the leading edge. The efficiency of the molecular clutch in converting this force into protrusion is variable. Because some components of the adhesion complex move along with the retrograde flow [9], the clutch slips [10]. The rate of forward protrusion increases however when actin and actin-adhesion linking components become more organized [11] and the retrograde flow of actin is subsequently slowed down [6, 12]. In this case the clutch can be described as “partially engaged”. As the adhesions grow and mature under stress, the clutch transforms from being “partially/locally engaged” to “engaged” [3] and hence can influence global cell behavior [13, 14]. Experiments have demonstrated that a biphasic relationship exists between the rate of actin flow and traction stress [15]. Whilst they are inversely related in the lamellipodium where nascent adhesions are formed and actin flow rate is high, the relationship becomes linear in areas with larger adhesions and slow actin flow [6], generating maximal propulsion at intermediate flow rates [16]. Two recent studies propose stochastic models that explain the state of adhesion clutches in these two regimes [17, 18] (reviewed in [19]). One study describes how adhesion stability is modulated by the competition between energy required for maintaining the elastic bonds at the moving actin-clutch interface, and the energy dissipation that occurs when myosin pulls in the viscoelastic actin interior [17]. When the transmitted force and the speed of actin flow are moderate, much of the energy is invested in producing traction on the substrate. At this critical transition range, either an increase or decrease in the ratio of bound adhesion complexes could theoretically occur. In the second study however, based on known experimental results, it was assumed that at moderate actin flow rates adhesion clutches reach a quasi-equilibrium state between bound and unbound forms [18]. Thus the catch bond model of receptor-actin interactions are more convincing than the slip bond since it is more likely to lead to clutch engagement and adhesion growth, as observed in the experimental studies. To find out more on the forces generated by the within the lamellipodia, read Step 4: Force Generation and Translocation. |
References
- Galbraith CG., Yamada KM. & Galbraith JA. Polymerizing actin fibers position integrins primed to probe for adhesion sites. Science 2007; 315(5814):992-5. [PMID: 17303755]
- Sero JE., German AE., Mammoto A. & Ingber DE. Paxillin controls directional cell motility in response to physical cues. Cell Adh Migr. 2012; 6(6). [Epub ahead of print] [PMID: 23076140]
- Giannone G., Mège RM. & Thoumine O. Multi-level molecular clutches in motile cell processes. Trends Cell Biol. 2009; 19(9):475-86. [PMID: 19716305]
- Parsons JT., Horwitz AR. & Schwartz MA. Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010; 11(9):633-43. [PMID: 20729930]
- Gardel ML., Schneider IC., Aratyn-Schaus Y. & Waterman CM. Mechanical integration of actin and adhesion dynamics in cell migration. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2010; 26:315-33. [PMID: 19575647]
- Alexandrova AY., Arnold K., Schaub S., Vasiliev JM., Meister JJ., Bershadsky AD. & Verkhovsky AB. Comparative dynamics of retrograde actin flow and focal adhesions: formation of nascent adhesions triggers transition from fast to slow flow. PLoS ONE 2008; 3(9):e3234. [PMID: 18800171]
- Suter DM. & Forscher P. Substrate-cytoskeletal coupling as a mechanism for the regulation of growth cone motility and guidance. J. Neurobiol. 2000; 44(2):97-113. [PMID: 10934315]
- Jurado C., Haserick JR. & Lee J. Slipping or gripping? Fluorescent speckle microscopy in fish keratocytes reveals two different mechanisms for generating a retrograde flow of actin. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005; 16(2):507-18. [PMID: 15548591]
- Guo WH. & Wang YL. Retrograde fluxes of focal adhesion proteins in response to cell migration and mechanical signals. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007; 18(11):4519-27. [PMID: 17804814]
- Jiang G., Giannone G., Critchley DR., Fukumoto E. & Sheetz MP. Two-piconewton slip bond between fibronectin and the cytoskeleton depends on talin. Nature 2003; 424(6946):334-7. [PMID: 12867986]
- Brown CM., Hebert B., Kolin DL., Zareno J., Whitmore L., Horwitz AR. & Wiseman PW. Probing the integrin-actin linkage using high-resolution protein velocity mapping. J. Cell. Sci. 2006; 119(Pt 24):5204-14. [PMID: 17158922]
- Hu K., Ji L., Applegate KT., Danuser G. & Waterman-Storer CM. Differential transmission of actin motion within focal adhesions. Science 2007; 315(5808):111-5. [PMID: 17204653]
- Assoian RK. & Klein EA. Growth control by intracellular tension and extracellular stiffness. Trends Cell Biol. 2008; 18(7):347-52. [PMID: 18514521]
- Reddig PJ. & Juliano RL. Clinging to life: cell to matrix adhesion and cell survival. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2005; 24(3):425-39. [PMID: 16258730]
- Gardel ML., Sabass B., Ji L., Danuser G., Schwarz US. & Waterman CM. Traction stress in focal adhesions correlates biphasically with actin retrograde flow speed. J. Cell Biol. 2008; 183(6):999-1005. [PMID: 19075110]
- Beningo KA., Dembo M., Kaverina I., Small JV. & Wang YL. Nascent focal adhesions are responsible for the generation of strong propulsive forces in migrating fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 2001; 153(4):881-888. [PMID: 11352946]
- Sabass B. & Schwarz US. Modeling cytoskeletal flow over adhesion sites: competition between stochastic bond dynamics and intracellular relaxation. J Phys Condens Matter. 2010; 22:194112. [PMID: 21386438]
- Li Y., Bhimalapuram P. & Dinner AR. Model for how retrograde actin flow regulates adhesion traction stresses. J Phys Condens Matter. 2010; 22(19):194113. [PMID: 21386439]
- Schwarz US. & Gardel ML. United we stand – integrating the actin cytoskeleton and cell-matrix adhesions in cellular mechanotransduction. J Cell Sci. 2012; 125(Pt 13):3051-3060. [PMID: 22797913]